GAZYVA + chemotherapy followed by GAZYVA monotherapy (n=691) | rituximab product + chemotherapy followed by rituximab product monotherapy (n=694) |
---|---|
Body System Adverse Reactionsa,b |
Infusion-related reactionsc | |
All Grades % | |
72 | 60 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
12 | 80 |
Neutropeniad | |
All Grades % | |
53 | 47 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
49 | 41 |
Thrombocytopeniad | |
All Grades % | |
14 | 8 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
7 | 3 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | |
All Grades % | |
50 | 43 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
3 | 1 |
Herpesvirus infection | |
All Grades % | |
18 | 14 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
3 | 1 |
Pneumonia | |
All Grades % | |
14 | 12 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
7 | 6 |
Cough | |
All Grades % | |
35 | 28 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
<1 | <1 |
Constipation | |
All Grades % | |
32 | 29 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
<1 | <1 |
Diarrhea | |
All Grades % | |
30 | 26 |
GRADES 3 to 5 % | |
3 | 2 |
Headache | |
All Grades % | |
18 | 15 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
<1 | <1 |
Artdralgia | |
All Grades % | |
16 | 14 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
0 | <1 |
Insomnia | |
All Grades % | |
15 | 12 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
<1 | <1 |
Decreased appetite | |
All Grades % | |
14 | 12 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
<1 | <1 |
Pruritus | |
All Grades % | |
11 | 9 |
Grades 3 to 5 % | |
<1 | 0 |
A randomized, open-label multicenter trial (GALLIUM) evaluated the safety of GAZYVA as compared to rituximab product in 1,385 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (86%) or marginal zone lymphoma (14%).
Laboratory Abnormalitiesa | GAZYVA + chemotherapy followed by GAZYVA monotherapy (n=691) | rituximab product + chemotherapy followed by rituximab product monotherapy (n=694) |
---|
All Grades % |
Grades 3 to 4 % |
All Grades % |
Grades 3 to 4 % |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Lymphopenia | 97 | 83 | 95 | 67 |
Leukopenia | 92 | 49 | 89 | 39 |
Neutropenia | 84 | 59 | 76 | 50 |
Thrombocytopenia | 68 | 11 | 50 | 4 |
ALT/SGPT increased | 50 | 3 | 43 | 2 |
AST/SGOT increased | 44 | 1 | 41 | 1 |
Hypophosphatemia | 36 | 5 | 33 | 5 |
Hypoalbuminemia | 33 | 1 | 25 | 1 |
Hypoproteinemia | 32 | 0 | 30 | 0 |
Hypocalcemia | 32 | 1 | 26 | 1 |
Hyperuricemia | 28 | 28 | 22 | 22 |
Hyponatremia | 26 | 4 | 20 | 3 |
Hyperkalemia | 23 | 1 | 17 | 1 |
Hypernatremia | 16 | <1 | 13 | 0 |
GAZYVA + chemotherapy followed by GAZYVA monotherapy (n=691) | rituximab product + chemotherapy followed by rituximab product monotherapy (n=694) |
---|---|
Laboratory Abnormalitiesa |
Lymphopenia | |
All Grades % | |
97 | 95 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
83 | 67 |
Leukopenia | |
All Grades % | |
92 | 89 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
49 | 39 |
Neutropenia | |
All Grades % | |
84 | 76 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
59 | 50 |
Thrombocytopenia | |
All Grades % | |
68 | 50 |
Grades 3 to 4% | |
11 | 4 |
ALT/SGPT increased | |
All Grades % | |
50 | 43 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
3 | 2 |
AST/SGOT increased | |
All Grades % | |
44 | 41 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
1 | 1 |
Hypophosphatemia | |
All Grades % | |
36 | 33 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
5 | 5 |
Hypoalbuminemia | |
All Grades % | |
33 | 25 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
1 | 1 |
Hypoproteinemia | |
All Grades % | |
32 | 30 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
0 | 0 |
Hypocalcemia | |
All Grades % | |
32 | 26 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
1 | 1 |
Hyperuricemia | |
All Grades % | |
28 | 22 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
28 | 22 |
Hyponatremia | |
All Grades % | |
26 | 20 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
4 | 3 |
Hyperkalemia | |
All Grades % | |
23 | 17 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
1 | 1 |
Hypernatremia | |
All Grades % | |
16 | 13 |
Grades 3 to 4 % | |
<1 | 0 |
The common adverse reactions (incidence ≥10%) observed at least 2% more with GAZYVA were upper respiratory tract infection (40%), cough (23%), musculoskeletal pain (20%), neutropenia (19%) and herpesvirus infection (13%)
New-onset Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was reported in 21% of patients in the GAZYVA arm (Grade 4, 10%) and 17% of patients in the rituximab product arm (Grade 4, 9%)
18% in the GAZYVA arm vs 15% in the rituximab product arm
Event | GAZYVA + chemotherapy followed by GAZYVA monotherapy (n=595) | rituximab product + chemotherapy followed by rituximab product monotherapy (n=597) |
---|
<60 y (n=298) | ≥60 y (n=297) | <60 y (n=320) | ≥60 y (n=277) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total number of patients with ≥1 event (adverse reaction or death), n (%) | 298 (100.0) | 295 (99.3) | 314 (98.1) | 274 (98.9) |
Number of patients with, n (%): | ||||
Serious adverse reactions | 115 (38.6) | 166 (55.9) | 111 (34.7) | 135 (48.7) |
Adverse reactions leading to death (Grade 5) | 3 (1.0) | 21 (7.1) | 5 (1.6) | 16 (5.8) |
Adverse reactions leading to treatment withdrawal | 35 (11.7) | 63 (21.2) | 39 (12.2) | 49 (17.7) |
GAZYVA + chemotherapy followed by GAZYVA monotherapy (n=595) | rituximab product + chemotherapy followed by rituximab product monotherapy (n=597) |
---|---|
Event |
Total number of patients with ≥1 event (adverse reaction or death), n (%) | |
<60 y (n=298) | <60 y (n=320) |
298 (100.0) | 314 (98.1) |
≥60 y (n=297) | ≥60 y (n=277) |
295 (99.3) | 274 (98.9) |
Number of patients with, n (%): |
Serious adverse reactions | |
<60 y (n=298) | <60 y (n=320) |
115 (38.6) | 111 (34.7) |
≥60 y (n=297) | ≥60 y (n=277) |
166 (55.9) | 135 (48.7) |
Adverse reactions leading to death (Grade 5) | |
<60 y (n=298) | <60 y (n=320) |
3 (1.0) | 5 (1.6) |
≥60 y (n=297) | ≥60 y (n=277) |
21 (7.1) | 16 (5.8) |
Adverse reactions leading to treatment withdrawal | |
<60 y (n=298) | <60 y (n=320) |
35 (11.7) | 39 (12.2) |
≥60 y (n=297) | ≥60 y (n=277) |
63 (21.2) | 49 (17.7) |
Clinical Trial Experience: Adverse Reactions for GAZYVA + Chemotherapy Followed by GAZYVA Monotherapy vs rituximab Product + Chemotherapy Followed by rituximab Product Monotherapy
Infusion-Related Reactions (IRR): Overall 72% of patients in the GAZYVA treated arm experienced IRRs (all grades). The incidence of Grade 3 to 4 IRRs for these patients was 12%. In Cycle 1, the incidence of IRRs (all grades) was 62% in the GAZYVA treated arm with Grade 3 to 4 IRRs reported in 10%. The incidence of IRRs (all grades) was highest on Day 1 (60%) and decreased on Days 8 and 15 (9% and 6% respectively). During Cycle 2, the incidence of IRRs (all grades) in the GAZYVA treated arm was 13% and decreased with subsequent cycles. During GAZYVA monotherapy treatment, IRRs (all grades) were observed in 9% of patients. Overall, 1% of patients experienced an IRR leading to discontinuation of GAZYVA.
Neutropenia: The incidence of neutropenia was higher in the GAZYVA treated arm (53%) compared to the rituximab product treated arm (47%). Cases of prolonged neutropenia (1%) and late onset neutropenia (4%) were also reported in the GAZYVA treated arm. The incidence of neutropenia was higher during treatment with GAZYVA in combination with chemotherapy (45%) compared to the GAZYVA monotherapy treatment phase (20%).
Infection: The incidence of infection was 82% in the GAZYVA treated arm and 73% in the rituximab product treated arm, with Grade 3 to 4 events reported in 21% and 17%, respectively. In the GAZYVA arm, fatal infections occurred in 2% of patients compared to <1% in the rituximab product arm. The incidence of Grade 3 to 4 infections in the GAZYVA and rituximab product treated arms was lower in patients receiving GCSF prophylaxis (14%; 16%) compared with patients not receiving GCSF prophylaxis (24%; 18%). The incidence of fatal infections in patients receiving GCSF prophylaxis in the GAZYVA and rituximab product treated arms was 2% and 0%, respectively, and was 2% and <1% in patients not receiving GCSF prophylaxis.
Thrombocytopenia: Thrombocytopenia was reported as an adverse reaction in 14% of the GAZYVA treated arm and 8% of the rituximab product treated arm, with the incidence of Grade 3 to 4 events being 7% and 3% respectively. The difference in incidences between the treatment arms is driven by events occurring during the first cycle. The incidence of thrombocytopenia (all grades) in the first cycle were 9% in the GAZYVA and 3% in the rituximab product treated arms, with Grade 3 to 4 rates being 5% and 1%, respectively. Both treatment arms had a 12% overall incidence of hemorrhagic events and a <1% incidence of fatal hemorrhagic events.
Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS): The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 TLS was 0.9% in the GAZYVA treated arm.
Musculoskeletal Disorders: Musculoskeletal disorders were reported in 54% of patients in the GAZYVA treated arm and 49% of patients in the rituximab product treated arm.
Gastrointestinal Perforation: Cases of gastrointestinal perforation have been reported in patients receiving GAZYVA, mainly in NHL.
Worsening of Pre-existing Cardiac Conditions: Fatal cardiac events have been reported in patients treated with GAZYVA.
Interested in more information about GAZYVA?
GAZYVA full Prescribing Information. South San Francisco, CA: Genentech, Inc.; 2022.
GAZYVA full Prescribing Information. South San Francisco, CA: Genentech, Inc.; 2022.
Mössner E, Brünker P, Moser S, et al. Increasing the efficacy of CD20 antibody therapy through the engineering of a new type II anti-CD20 antibody with enhanced direct and immune effector cell–mediated B-cell cytotoxicity. Blood. 2010;115(22):4393-4402.
Mössner E, Brünker P, Moser S, et al. Increasing the efficacy of CD20 antibody therapy through the engineering of a new type II anti-CD20 antibody with enhanced direct and immune effector cell–mediated B-cell cytotoxicity. Blood. 2010;115(22):4393-4402.
Herter S, Herting F, Mundigl O, et al. Preclinical activity of the type II CD20 antibody GA101 (obinutuzumab) compared with rituximab and ofatumumab in vitro and in xenograft models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(10):2031-2042.
Herter S, Herting F, Mundigl O, et al. Preclinical activity of the type II CD20 antibody GA101 (obinutuzumab) compared with rituximab and ofatumumab in vitro and in xenograft models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(10):2031-2042.
Klein C, Lammens A, Schäfer W, et al. Epitope interactions of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 and their relationship to functional properties. mAbs. 2013;5(1):22-33.
Klein C, Lammens A, Schäfer W, et al. Epitope interactions of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 and their relationship to functional properties. mAbs. 2013;5(1):22-33.
Honeychurch J, Alduaij W, Azizyan M, et al. Antibody-induced nonapoptotic cell death in human lymphoma and leukemia cells is mediated through a novel reactive oxygen species-dependent pathway. Blood. 2012;119(15):3523-3533.
Honeychurch J, Alduaij W, Azizyan M, et al. Antibody-induced nonapoptotic cell death in human lymphoma and leukemia cells is mediated through a novel reactive oxygen species-dependent pathway. Blood. 2012;119(15):3523-3533.
VENCLEXTA® (venetoclax tablets) Prescribing Information. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie Inc; 2022.
VENCLEXTA® (venetoclax tablets) Prescribing Information. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie Inc; 2022.
CALQUENCE® (acalabrutinib) Prescribing Information. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2019.
CALQUENCE® (acalabrutinib) Prescribing Information. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2019.
IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) Prescribing Information. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; 2022.
IMBRUVICA® (ibrutinib) Prescribing Information. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; 2022.
Data on file. Genentech, Inc.
Data on file. Genentech, Inc.
Seymour JF, Marcus R, Davies A, et al. Haematologica. 2019;104(6):1202-1208.
Seymour JF, Marcus R, Davies A, et al. Haematologica. 2019;104(6):1202-1208.
Casulo C, Byrtek M, Dawson KL, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(23):2516-2522.
Casulo C, Byrtek M, Dawson KL, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(23):2516-2522.
Canales M, Buchholz T, Izutsu K, et al. Obinutuzumab short duration infusion in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: results from the end of induction analysis of the phase IV GAZELLE study. Presented at ASCO 2021.
Canales M, Buchholz T, Izutsu K, et al. Obinutuzumab short duration infusion in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: results from the end of induction analysis of the phase IV GAZELLE study. Presented at ASCO 2021.
The information contained in this section of the site is intended for U.S. healthcare professionals only. Click "OK" if you are a healthcare professional.
The link you have selected will take you away from this site to one that is not owned or controlled by Genentech, Inc. Genentech, Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information contained on sites we do not own or control. Genentech does not recommend and does not endorse the content on any third-party websites. Your use of third-party websites is at your own risk and subject to the terms and conditions of use for such sites.